Key: A =  Nunnery Gatehouse [mostly Tudor]   B =  Former nunnery cemetery C = Iron Age fort   D = 'Robin Hood's Grave'

In relation to the supposed site of the ballad hero's burial, "In 1795 The late Sir Samuel Armytage, owner of the premises caused the ground to be dug a yard deep and found that it had never been disturbed"⁴. It could be argued that perhaps the stone had been removed from an original site nearby. This would appear to solve the arrow distance problem as well as the lack of any skeletal remains and gives greater prominence to the siting of the suposed grave. However, the lack of evidence for a body renders the Corpus delicti of low quality.
The proximity to the grave of the pre-1815 "Kings Highway", now a track, was  mentioned in Grafton's Chronicle of 1569:

Grafton also states:

However this seems confounded later by the following in Camden's Britannica, 1607 ⁷ :

In 1665 almost 100 years after Grafton had recorded these comments, Dr. Nathaniel Johnston³ made a drawing at Kirklees in which the Robin Hood grave slab bore an inscription which was much weathered by the doctor's time:
 

Note that the crosslets on the Armitage Coat of Arms appear to be taken from the purported grave slab of Robert Hude. That Elizabeth de Stainton's grave is now in the priory garden there is no doubt, so was one of the graves moved? Certainly they now are separated and it is unlikely that an outlaw's grave would be included in consecrated ground. The ridge position for the present site of Robin's supposed grave is set amongst other gravestones, perhaps this is a later cemetery for the laity who died at Kirklees priory and were buried either side of the roadway. We can perhaps exclude the Armitage family using this cemetery as they appear to have had their vault at St. Peter's, Hartshead. There is a definite need for a grave site map and list. Steven Hill's grandfather worked on the Kirklees estate as a tenant farmer and left letters which described how he ploughed a field and turned up some bones at the lower end of this field. Sir George, the owner at the time, indicated this could have been the site of a cemetery. Steven describes this site as being in the field just below the wood before The Three Nuns. Barbara Green states that part of a stone cross originally described as being part of the grave of Robin Hood may be found in the cemetery of St. Peter's, Hartshead and that the grave may have been moved during the English Civil War.⁷ By the 1800's the grave slab [on the ridge?] had been cut off by railway workers and later in the century the grave was excavated [by Sir Samuel Armytage⁷] but nothing was found. An iron railing fence on a low brick wall was placed around the grave site on the ridge by Sir George Armytage. There are numerous other stone crosses, empty stone coffins and sarcophogi on the same hillside, nothing has been done to catalogue or conserve them⁷.
Three side-linked maps of Kirklees from 1855:
Map 1
Map 2
Map 3 [detail]

Perhaps a more fitting investigation may be caried out by archaeological excavation of the priory and its foundations in order to determine, without preconception, the history and function of this relatively undisturbed former religious site. On the death of her husband, Lady Armytage sold Kirklees Hall in 1983 which now forms luxury residential units. Her new residence is on the site of the priory and garden. Elizabeth de Staynton's grave is now in the residence garden⁶. This "new site" is approximately where the original Armytage residence at Kirklees was established in Elizabeth I's time [Baines-see below]. The original priory cloister, church, garden and consecrated cemetery were situated on the north side of Nun Brook. Any archaeological study is likely to reveal more about the legend of Kirklees as the death place of Robin Hood, rather than the area being used by local entrepreneurs trying to make money from tourism or even, God forbid, a Theme Park. Please leave the theme parks in Nottingham !

The date from the epitaph above puts the death date in Henry III's time. The oldest reference to the above epitaph comes from  Martin Parker in 1631⁸ who apparently saw it and gave it a death date in the time of Richard I.
Parker gave the following rendition:

The similarity to the epitaph stone now in the brick wall of the "Robin Hood" grave on the ridge is strong, which may indicate that the present epitaph may be a copy of this apparently earlier version. The reference to Robin Hood being the 'Earl of Huntington' is taken straight out of Anthony Munday's plays, there is no evidence that the ballad hero was such, it being a later embellishment of the story.

Was the ballad hero buried here?
English folklore is an extremely colourful if dishonest portrayal of  historical events. One might surmise that the hero is purely a character of The Geste, the imaginings of the ballad-muse based on [a] real-life inspiration[s]. The Kirklees connection in the Geste with Barnsdale seems incongruous. This connection is made in the later verses of the ballad and is likely to have been added as an after thought, perhaps by a different person to the one who began the tale. Why would Robyn and Little John have travelled all this way from Barnsdale when there was an equally suitable Cistercian nunnery at Hampole?  It seems that the person who completed the Geste was using his local Barnsdale knowledge and shifting it to Kirklees. Why? Perhaps to avoid a legal suit or more likely it cast, once again, dark clouds over the lands of the manor of Wakefield, within whose lands the Kirklees nunnery lay. Scandalous behaviour in the monasteries at this time was rife, and this helped move the spotlight from Hampole to Kirklees, neither of which were blameless. The two nunneries were in contact with each other for in history there appears to have been an exchange or transfer programme operating between one Cistercian nunnery and the other. This was probably carried out to move the scandal away from its source. In the 1300's the prioresses were very busy covering up their in-house scandals, something certain aspects of today's tabloid media would welcome if only to increase the sales of their lurid efforts. In 1323 a nun, Agnes de Swystane, was sent from Kirklees, for an unknown reason, to Hampole nunnery. The prioresses at the time were Margaret de Screvyn [Kirklees priory] and Margaret de Hecke [Hampole priory].
If the author of the Geste was resident in Burghwallis as we have suggested elsewhere, then they were writing from the perspective of a liegeman of the De Laci family or their inheritor within the honour of Pontefract. The manor of Wakefield, under the Warrenes and Pontefract under the De Lacis and later Thomas earl of Lancaster had been in constant local dispute since at least 1317 after the 'abduction' of Thomas Plantagenet's wife, Alice de Laci, heiress to Pontefract. There were plenty of persons appearing in the Wakefield Court Rolls in the late 1200's and early 1300's with names similar to 'Robert Hood' of Sowerby, Wakefield and Newton near Wakefield. This allowed the author/compiler to again utilise the poor social behaviour of the manor to castigate his local opposition whilst garnering a name for his hero. When we feed in the name 'De Doncastre' of the later verses we also see the use of an actual persons name, Roger De Doncaster, who was most probably related to John De Doncaster, a local justice and steward to the abbot of St. Mary's York and John the eighth earl of Warrene in the manor of Wakefield . It was earl Warrene's knight who had Alice De Laci 'abducted' and taken to the Warrene castle at Reigate in Surrey.
Thus it is considered here that from the ballad and the ballad only, the notion that a non-historical character called Robyn Hode was buried here, gained momentum and was greatly enlarged upon in subsequent ballad renderings.

2. In the list of Yorkshire sheriffs there are named:
    Joh. Armitage, de Kirklees, arm.1614
    Sir S. Armytage, bart.1740
    Sir George Armytage 1775
    Sir George Armytage /Armitage, bt.1791
Also a Welter Fawkes esq. in 1789 [This Fawkes name is in the Fawkes Middlesex household which the Armytage's were visiting during  the1881 census]
These appointments would no doubt have spurred them on to investigate the nexus between the title and the local stories and structures concerning "Robin Hood" and "The Sheriff of Nottingham" Did their titles also include that of the Sheriff of Nottinghamshire as with some other sheriffs? [Note There was never was a sheriff of Nottingham but there was a keeper of Nottingham Castle [constable] and a Sheriff of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire - the counties]

3. From : Bibliomania.
"Bow and arrow of Robin Hood: The [supposed] traditional bow and arrow of Robin Hood are religiously preserved at Kirklees Hall,
Yorkshire, the seat of Sir George Armytage; and the site of his grave is pointed out in the park".
This rivals Little John's bow at Hathersage Church which was later moved to Cannon Hall, Cawthorne. The last I heard, the bow of Little John was held by a laird in Scotland. Does anyone have any more recent knowledge of this?
email contact

Steve who at one time operated the Hartshead web site says that in 1938 his grandfather was invited to take up the tenancy of Home Farm, on the Kirklees Park property. Steve's father recalled a room in the old Gatehouse. This was a small room with a bed in the centre, by the window to the right a small table with a candle. To the right of this stood a full suit of armour beside which stood a bow and three arrows. Ritson in 1795 mentioned, that Robin's bow and arrows were preserved at Fountains Abbey. Thus it is likely that the alleged bow and arrows were removed, perhaps by one of the new land owners. However according to the ballad, Robin asked Little John to bury him with his sword, bow and arrows.
                                                  
                                                       

                                                                         A comparison of two images of the Gatehouse:

Note that Ritson's 1795 drawing [right hand image] probably appears closer to the appearance of the original gatehouse. Its form is essentially Tudor and may therefore have been extensively modified over the period of its life ending in 1538. The gate can just be seen between the left and right wings. There seems to have been considerable modification to the right wing and the upstairs windows of the left wing and the gateway seems to have been filled in.

4."The extensive family and estate papers of the Armytage family of Kirklees Hall are already held in Calderdale Archives, but an item recently received refers to the very early period of Kirklees Priory. It is a facsimile of a quitclaim dated 1234 by Sibil, prioress of Kirklees, to the monks of Rievaulx Abbey, relating to lands in Harden, Cullingworth and elsewhere. The small Cistercian priory of Kirklees was founded in 1155. At the Dissolution there was a scattering of its lands and possessions. The site of the priory was granted in 1544 to John Tasburgh and Nicholas Savile. The Saviles were a noted family in the area and much of the Kirklees estate was acquired by various family members. In 1565 Robert Pilkington and his wife, Alice Savile, conveyed the manor of Kirklees to John Armytage of Farnley Tyas, and the Armytage family maintained possession until the twentieth century.
Note: A Margaret de Savile was at one time a prioress at Kirklees. Her father was Sir John Savile who married the heiress Isobel de Eland, relative of Sir John de Eland, the wicked Yorkshire sheriff and John earl Warrene's steward for the manor of Wakefield. See Elland Feud.

5. At the Heritage Web the following reference was found :
:"[1760] ARMYTAGE, G.  ACCOUNT OF THE EXCAVATIONS AT KIRKLEES PRIORY,
YORKSHIRE. Proc. Soc. Antiq. 21, (1),1905-1906. 14pp, 2b/w pls, 1 folding plan, £4.00"

6. Dr. David Hepworth of  Huddersfield University has taken photographs of the "Robin Hood" grave. His photographs definitely look better than those taken in the previous decade although there is some evidence that the best aspect has been portrayed.

HOAX
Further recent investigation indicates that the Kirklees burial site is a hoax perpetrated, knowingly or unknowingly by John Armitage, sheriff of Yorkshire in the 1600's. Having newly aquired the Kirklees estate from Pilkington and also having an interest in the office of sheriff, he assumed 'Kyrkely' in the Geste to be Kirklees. From this nucleus of conflation a hoax burial site was constructed to commemorate the supposed outlaw's last resting place. This hoax has created a monster in itself, not the least for the Armitage family, who whilst trying to run a farming business have been inundated and bombarded with requests for entrance to visit the site by the superficially curious and the downright mentally unhinged. In fact the person who inspired the ballad hero is buried far away in another county, lost, forgotten and profoundly uncelebrated.

Home